Cher Lloyd - human Marmite...

I’ve been glued to the X Factor since it returned to our screens in August this year; although the auditions are my least favourite part of the process, it is the part that determines whether or not an act has the ‘X Factor’; if they can turn the 3000 strong audience into a screaming, applauding frenzy then they could go the distance.

In my opinion, each year the same types of artist’s step onto the stage and sing the same predictable songs. This year, a new type of artist was found, and this new artist came in the form of 17 year old, Cher Lloyd from Malvern in Worcestershire. As soon as she stepped onto the stage, she commanded the arena with her edgy fashion and quirky looks. When she unveiled her song choice, Keri Hilson’s version of ‘Turn My Swag On’, the judges looked puzzled; firstly, I doubt they even heard the original, and secondly, they knew that the audition could go one of two ways...

Cher Lloyd’s audition was, personally, my favourite ever X Factor audition; she was fresh, edgy, and young and she oozed confidence. Although she’s not the best MC and sometimes tries a bit too hard when she raps, she CAN sing, and the singing and MC’ing work well together – it sets her apart from the other acts in the competition. And my thoughts were reflected in the judge’s comments too with all four judges being impressed by Lloyd’s audition. Cheryl Cole commented, saying: “Cher, you are right up my street!” and Simon Cowell said: “That was a great, great audition!” However, although most loved her, other parts of the nation began to form a hate campaign against her.

The further she progressed in the competition, the harsher the scrutiny was from the public, yet the judging panel still favoured Cher and her talent. Cher was labelled ‘fake’, a ‘copycat’ and a ‘mini-Cheryl’; with many saying that Cher was trying too hard to be like Cole. Lloyd also came under fire for using another artists lyrics that she tried to pass off as her own. Admittedly, that was stupid; she has the talent and shouldn’t need to use someone else’s work as her own. Although the British public appeared to slowly be turning against her, A-List artists such as Usher and Keri Hilson were praising her.

Inevitably, Lloyd made it to the live shows of the competition, amidst the ‘Gamugate’ drama, and once securely in the live finals, Lloyd came out each week proving she deserved to be in the competition. Below is her week one performance from the live shows where she sung ‘Just Be Good to me’, originally made famous by the SOS Band.

That performance is a sign of things to come; as the weeks progress, Cher will prove why she’s in the competition. Although she may not win the X Factor, she’s going to be around for a long while yet and people are just going to give themselves a migraine if they keep hating on her because, eventually, she’ll change all the hater’s opinions and the hater’s will hate admitting to that. At the end of the day, the X Factor is a talent contest and Cher Lloyd IS talented; wasn’t it the British public that kept tone-deaf twins Jedward in the competition last year? They had no talent but didn’t get as much bad publicity as what Cher has received. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

So, the original question I had was ‘Cher Lloyd – cheap impersonator or the next big thing?’ My answer: the next big thing.

should University student's have to pay for higher education costs?

Everyone has a guilty pleasure, and my guilty pleasure is the daytime TV programme ‘Loose Women’. You may mock, but its good TV! On today’s episode, a topic of debate amongst the ladies was whether it was fair to ask students to pay for higher education. As soon as I heard this, my ears soon perked up. I thought it’d be interesting to see what the loose ladies made of this...

From what I can gather, only Lynda Bellingham had been to University, but Andrea McLean had been to a Polytechnic College to study and Jane McDonald had left school, gone into full-time work and funded herself through a night school college course. Carol McGiffin remained silent; presumably she never went to University or college. The ladies were all aware how expensive tuition fees are, and they seemed almost shocked that Universities could charge their own tuition fee rate, dependent on what the University itself wanted to charge. Lynda felt that by upping the tuition fees to an even more extortionate rate, that is only discouraging students to go to University as they won’t be able to afford it. Andrea said that we need more doctors, medics, lawyers, etc, but seeing as they are such academic courses and only certain Universities offer those courses, those Universities will charge as much as they like just because they know students will pay the amount they charge because they can’t go anywhere else to study. Carol highlighted the fact that if students do proceed to go to University if the fees increase then when they graduate, they will be coming out with £40,000 worth of debt, which gives no incentive to attend at all if that’s all they have to show for it.

As a University student myself, I’m 50:50 with the points the loose ladies made. It is true, that even now the University fees are expensive. I mean, it’s £3,225 for a year at the minute, and I’ve already applied to Student Finance for the year 2010/2011 and the yearly fee has increased to £3,290. I do agree with the point that was made about it discouraging potential students to attend University due to how much the fees are, but the Student Loans Company pays for your three year study at the University, and yes, you are left with debt, but nothing happens until you’re earning more than £15,000 a year and even then you just have it deducted from your wages. So it’s never really there, in a way. I do agree that if Universities are given the power to charge as much as they want for tuition fees then they will abuse this and charge silly amounts for certain courses, particularly the academic courses like medicine. But relating back to the original question posed, yes, I do think students should have to pay for higher education. At the end of the day, you don’t have to attend University; you choose to go off your own back. I mean, if you apply to University and pay nothing, but then decide to drop out mid-way through, and then money is being wasted on someone who doesn’t want to be there, but that money could have been used on someone who was desperate to attend University and better themselves in the future. If someone drops out of University too far on in the academic year, they’re charged the full yearly fee, which I think is fair. That said, if the Universities do get the power to charge their own tuition fees, and they are too expensive for students to afford, then I do think a contribution should be made on behalf of the University so that the fee is subsidised. I mean, if once a student graduates they’re left with a nice big debt worth £40,000 and come out with a rubbish degree, then yeah, all they have to show for it IS the £40,000 worth of debt, what do they have to show for the last three years?

Rant over. But I was just so shocked that Loose Women were having a debate over student’s tuition fees and I was so interested to hear their opinions, especially from four women who have such diverse education backgrounds. Like I said – Loose Women makes for great TV.

Oh, and one final thing. I was wrong about Andrea McLean not attending University; she attended a Polytechnic College – COVENTRY polytechnic college! Oh yes, I’m attending the same University that Andrea McLean attended, and look at where she is now!

Run, Papa, Run - East Asian Film Society

Run Papa Run is the tale of a Triad Boss trying to conceal his true identity from his young daughter, worried that by her finding out about what he really does for a living, she will be ashamed by him.

When the film first starts, I thought we would be in for another comedy film (still hoping to replicate the enjoyment of Sophie’s Revenge), but what the film delivers was something different. Yes, the film gave me enjoyment, but it also gave me a variety of other emotions, such as shock, upset and hurt; a feat that none of the other East Asian Film Society films had yet achieved. After the first comedic scene of the film, it then moves into the funeral of the main character, Tin-Yun. The events that lead up to his death are played in sequence, which meant that we, as the audience, don’t find out what caused his death until the end of the film. Throughout the film, we see Tin-Yun fall in love with a lady that eventually becomes his wife. Tin-Yun still manages to work as a member of the Triad whilst married, but as soon as his daughter is born, he begins to have doubts about his job. At first he refuses to get close to his daughter; he won’t even cradle her when she awakes form her sleep in the middle of the night. But this isn’t because he has no love for her, it is because he doesn’t want her to get hurt, and he fears that with the job he does, that will happen. However, events changes and we see Tin-Yun give into his paternal instincts, and he develops a great sense of love for his daughter. As he ages, so does his daughter, yet the close bond between daughter and father still remain. Tin-Yun is also promoted to Triad leader, which means does he not only have responsibility for his wife and daughter, he is also responsible for the reputation of the criminal underworld.

When Tin-Yun’s daughter reaches her teenage years, she begin to date a boy that she was friends with as a young child. Tin-Yun doesn’t approve, but when does any father approve when his daughter starts dating boys? When he realises his daughter is not a little girl anymore, he accepts his daughter’s relationship. But more problems follow. After a row between mother-father-daughter, Tin-Yun’s wife leaves home, leaving their daughter to live with Tin-Yun. When Tin-Yun realises he still wants to be a part of his wife’s life and his daughter’s, he sets about trying to relieve him of his Triad duties. However, when he has to complete one last job, things takes a turn for the worst. In the middle of a drug raid aboard an at-sail boat, Tin-Yun is shot in the crossfire, falls into the sea and sadly dies. Then the film switches to the present day, when Tin-Yun’s friends and family are all present at his funeral.

The reason this film filled me with conflicting emotions is because of the issues the film deals with. It deals with love, loss, death, misery, happiness, to name but a few. Also, Tin-Yun was a lost soul. He didn’t intend to fall in love and get his wife pregnant, nor did he expect to love his baby as much as what he did. But when his daughter was born, he was no longer lost; he now had something to live for. The tragic part is that he realised this before it was too late.

Accident - East Asian Film Society

My first impression of the film judging by its name was that it wasn’t going to be a happy event. However, I didn’t expect it to be as confusing as what it was. As soon as the film started, immediately there was drama - a victim was thrown through the front windscreen of a car after a collision and the victim appeared to have been left for dead. As the film continued, there appeared to be four main characters, but their occupation was shrouded in mystery. I thought they were assassins or hit men of some sort, but they were in fact ‘accident choreographers’, which is the same as an assassin but they kill their targets through well staged ‘accidents’.

It wasn’t until the middle of the film when I actually started to gain interest. The team, which consisted of ‘fatty’ and ‘uncle’, were planning to eliminate someone by electrocuting them on tram lines, and they were sorting out the technicalities of this staged ‘accident’. The team successfully managed to eliminate their target, but something went horribly wrong. To the audience, it appeared that a bus had lost control and almost ran the Brian, as he was named on Wikipedia, over. However, the Brian managed to escape the path of the out of control bus, but instead the bus hit and killed ’Fatty’. This event traumatised the Brian, and slowly we saw the Brian become very mentally unstable - he became very secluded and very paranoid, convinced that there was an organisation out there that wanted to kill the Brian and his team.

The Brian slowly severed all ties with his team mates, but this resulted in his team mates becoming easy targets. Uncle ’fell’ several stories out of a window, and the only female member of the Brian’s team was killed by himself as he felt she had betrayed him and gone to another organisation to eliminate the Brian. Her death was particularly gruesome - she was impaled in the temple with a pressurised water gasket that instantly killed her. However, by this point of the film, I genuinely was confused and it wasn’t until I came home and read a review that I understood what exactly was going on. But after this part of the film was over, everything became a little predictable and disappointing. There was a scene where an eclipse happened, and a woman was ran over by a car, even though the Brian tried to stop the accident from happening due to his sudden attack of a guilty conscience. But the woman died anyway. Then The Brian was stabbed to death by the woman’s husband, and then the film finished. Boring.

After coming home and reading about the plot in more detail, I realised that the woman who died at the start of the film was in fact the Brian’s wife, hence why he was carrying the watch that the audience saw smashed in the wreckage of the crash. But even after reading about the plot in more detail, I still wasn’t fulfilled. The film just didn’t seem to have any momentum to it at all. It just plodded through the scenes without really pulling them together, hence why I, as a member of the audience, felt so confused. The plot was very vague and wasn’t shown in very much detail, and I also felt like I had seen films like it before, but done a lot more effectively - it seemed like a cheap imitation. Sadly, the film didn’t even come close to Sophie’s Revenge, and it was also the film I enjoyed the least out of the films I have seen so far.

Sophie's Revenge - East Asian Film Society

I had pre-conceived ideas of what to expect from the film, and from reading the synopsis, I figured I’d be bored stiff. But I was VERY surprised by how much I actually enjoyed the film!

Even though the dialogue was in Chinese, there were English sub-titles, but it soon became hard to watch the film AND read the sub-titles. But the film was nothing like I expected. There were many times throughout the film where I, and the majority of the room, laughed out loud.

Zhang Ziyi is well known in western cinema due to her starring roles in martial arts films such as ‘Hero’, so it was good to see another side to her acting skills apart from the ones we’re so used to where it usually involves her using some cool kung fu moves on a bunch of hapless men. She played the role of the neurotic Sophie fantastically. One minute she was ‘Sane Sophie’, and then the next minute she was ‘Psycho Sophie’, but both roles were played well.

Even though I praise the majority of the film, it was predictable. Once the film got going, you could see common conventions of western ‘rom-coms’ forming. You knew that Sophie would try to exact revenge on the boyfriend she was dumped by, and then the guy who was helping her would fall in love with her and Sophie would secretly fall for him, and then you knew her ex boyfriend would realise he wanted Sophie back, but by that point it would be too late as Sophie had moved on to her happy ever after. Predictable as it was, it still made for easy and enjoyable viewing.

Personally, I thought the only films to come out of East Asia were martial arts films and horror films, with the horror movies being remade for western audiences before the original is shown. However, this film proved to me just how uncultured I am. ‘Sophie’s Revenge’ was as good as any romantic comedy film to come out of Hollywood. It had all the conventions for a classic film and we take for granted what talented directors East Asia has making films. However, this film is good when marketed to the right people. If this film was put out to a mass audience, there’s no way it would have a good turnover due to people’s uncultured views, just like the views I had before watching the film.